Help improve historical accuracy by reporting an answer, explanation, source or accessibility problem.
Last updated: October 10, 2026
What to report
We welcome reports of incorrect dates, historical claims, misleading question stems, multiple defensible answers, weak or repetitive distractors, unclear explanations, mismatched answer keys, inaccessible content and broken references.
How reports are evaluated
Include the exact practice-test URL, question number, the issue and the evidence supporting your proposed correction. Reports are reviewed for accuracy and impact; not every disagreement indicates an error. When warranted, we revise the content while retaining the existing page address.
Privacy and response expectations
Please do not send confidential school records, identifying student details or sensitive information. Form messages are processed by a third-party delivery provider. We may respond for clarification, but cannot guarantee individual replies or a fixed correction deadline. See our Privacy Policy.
For teachers and students
If you think more than one answer is defensible, explain the historical interpretation and cite the relevant source. If a question is too easy or repetitive, identify which distractors fail and suggest what historical misconception a better alternative should test.
Suggested report: “Question 12 on [URL] says X, but [source] supports Y because…”